I wasn't going to bore you further with the results of the "test" runs but today I noticed something. One of the outcomes from testing cells which are now abused is that the low cell capacity gives a fast cycle turn around. I was looking at cell F, which has now been though 300+ pulse charge cycles, and I was trying to understand the cyclical variation in capacity.
It appears that the reported cell capacity for a charge/discharge cycle is highly correlated (r=0.974) with the cell voltage at the first discharge measurement. This measurement is taken 20 seconds after discharge commences.
The first handful of observations demonstrate this:
Cycle | mAh | Voltage at t=20 sec | |
1 | 77.3 | 3.779 | |
2 | 69.7 | 3.773 | |
3 | 68.3 | 3.766 | |
4 | 67.2 | 3.760 | |
5 | 65.8 | 3.753 | |
6 | 63.6 | 3.747 | |
7 | 63.4 | 3.747 | |
8 | 62.2 | 3.740 | |
9 | 62.1 | 3.740 | |
10 | 62.2 | 3.740 | |
11 | 62.3 | 3.740 | |
12 | 68.1 | 3.760 | |
13 | 74.1 | 3.779 |
Comparing cycle 11 and 12 a 20mV difference in the cell voltage existed after 20 secs of the discharge test. The ADC step size is 6.5mV per bit. So it's a much larger error than I expected and some experimentation with the charge termination is required.
No comments:
Post a Comment